Hobby Lobby And The Arrogance Of Faith

we will not go backThe Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, is coming under fire again tomorrow. This time the nice folks from Hobby Lobby craft stores and Conestoga Wood Specialities are contesting the portion of the law that mandates insurance coverage, without copay, of preventative medical services. Translated, that means insurance policies must pay for a certain list of medications and procedures that were deemed “preventative care” by the Institute of Medicine, an independent review board. This list includes non-controversial things such as diabetes screenings and mammograms. It also includes contraception, which is the issue Hobby Lobby and its brethren oppose.

The plaintiffs in this case say that four particular types of covered contraception (two IUDs and two emergency contraception medications) actually induce abortion and their religious principles demand that they not pay for coverage of such things for their employees. Never mind that the devices and medications in question do not end pregnancies. There is a line in the fine print that says that they might and that’s enough of a risk for the Hobby Lobby folks to want to stay away.

I’m pretty sure they’re going to win. And I’m pretty angry because their adherence to a strict anti-choice dogma is potentially going to undermine the most sweeping reform of health care financing this nation has seen since Medicare.

Contrary to popular belief, the Affordable Care Act was not an act of naked tyranny perpetuated by the Obama administration just for the fun of seeing Glenn Beck turn purple. The prime directives of the law are two-part. First, establish a minimum threshold for what constitutes adequate health insurance (prior to the law there was no uniform definition of what constituted health insurance at all, much less what insurance must cover to be acceptable). Second, reform the market for purchasing insurance such that vendors can no longer shut out customers. These reforms are critical because it means everyone can now buy insurance and the insurance they buy will actually cover the services they will need. This was not true before this and you don’t have to go far into Google search results to read horror stories of insurance leaving sick people out in the cold.

So. The Affordable Care Act affects everyone in America and, I contend, will affect them in a positive way. Deconstructing this law, I contend, harms everyone in America.

But. Then there’s Hobby Lobby. The family who owns it is devoutly Christian and wants to make sure they don’t spend a single penny on health services that might be construed as abortion. And if you listen to the commentary, that’s a sure-fire outcome of paying for IUDs and emergency contraception.

Or is it? Let’s crunch some numbers. According to Forbes, in 2013, Hobby Lobby employed 23,000 people. For the sake of argument, let’s assume the universe of employees is statistically the same as the rest of the US, as outlined in the 2010 census. So 50.8% of the 23,000 are women, leaving us with 11,684 employees. Of those 11,684, 36% are between the ages of 18-44, prime child bearing years, so that bring us down to 4,206 people likely to be using Hobby Lobby insurance to pay for contraceptives. According to Guttmacher Institute, 5.6% of contraceptive users choose IUDs so that would be 235 Hobby Lobby employees. IUDs have an effectiveness rate of 99.9% becauseĀ IUDs prevent ovulation and/or prevent sperm from making it to the egg for the most part. If they fail to prevent either of those events, a sperm could fertilize and egg and not implant due to the IUD. If that happens 1 out of a 100 times, that’s 2 Hobby Lobby employees.

Two. The owners of Hobby Lobby are willing to undermine a health insurance law that has a positive benefit on EVERY SINGLE PERSON IN AMERICA for the sake of two fertilized eggs. And I’m pretty sure the Supreme Court is going to allow it to happen because of a misbegotten notion of religious liberty.

This is the moment when religion overrides science and technology and medical best practices. This is when religion overrides the greater good to assuage the conscience of a minority. This is the arrogance of faith.




Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

4 comments for “Hobby Lobby And The Arrogance Of Faith

  1. SS
    March 25, 2014 at 12:33 pm

    This wasn’t about contraception. 21 of the 25 contraception devices Hobby Lobby approved. It was about an abortion inducing drugs. No one is being denied coverage. Those who work for Hobby Lobby know what type of religious organization they work for. The government shouldn’t be able to compel someone to finance something that is morally repulsive. I bet you cheer when Apple announces it will support global warming initiatives regardless of profit. Or when certain businesses support gay intiatives. So why can’t religious businesses do the same?

  2. Tiffany
    March 28, 2014 at 2:32 am

    SS, if I disagreed with Apple’s global warming initiatives, I could go elsewhere to buy a computer. Since I disagree with Chik-Fil-A’s stance on gay rights, I don’t eat there (not a problem for me, since I don’t care for the food anyway). But someone who works for a large corporation like Hobby Lobby cannot necessarily shop elsewhere for their health insurance coverage. If you worked there, would you realistically have a choice in employers, given today’s economy, the job opportunities available, and a family to support? That is a significant difference.

    In addition, if they get an exception for their beliefs, then the whole law may unravel, which is what Rebekah means by people being denied coverage.

    Also, what if they belonged to a religious group that is morally opposed to blood transfusions? Or organ donations? Or psychological treatment? Should they be able to decide that you, as an employee, should not be covered for those medical procedures too? A basic standard of medical care that is available to everyone makes the most logical sense, and is the fairest system. Also, as an employee, I am paying for part of my premiums — I should have the right to get the coverage I want, too. So let everyone pay for the same coverage, and let each individual use or not use that coverage as he or she sees fit.

  3. Leonard Cahnmann
    April 1, 2014 at 8:28 pm

    Isn’t birth control less expensive than prenatal care and delivery, not to mention when the baby arrives, he or she will be added to the family policy. Therefore the premium for a policy with bc should be lower than one that does not cover bc.

  4. July 19, 2014 at 5:01 pm

    Emergency repair service contractors level the ground and the results of the
    school bus project. A small but important technicality:
    Request signed lien releases from all across South Wales.
    High angle rescue technicians are team of professionals is absolutely no value.
    Similarly, the finish worth it.

Comments are closed.